Wall Street banks tweak stock forecasts all the time. Most of those moves barely register for more than a day or two. Every now and then, though, a target lands like a verdict, a data-heavy way of saying, “This stock has already sprinted past the reality on the ground.”
That is how I read what Goldman Sachs just did with Target (TGT) on April 27, 2026.
Target has climbed 19.6% over the past three months and 37.1% over the past six, according to a Goldman Sachs research note dated April 27. The stock was at $129.26 when that note went out. Goldman’s 12‑month price target is still $112, or about 13.4% below that level, and if you bought into the recent rally, that gap should get your attention.
Photo by Bloomberg on Getty Images
What Goldman Sachs actually saw in the aisles
Goldman analyst Kate McShane and her team did not just stare at a model. They went into a Target store in Dallas on April 23, 2026, and watched what shoppers were doing, what was stocked, and what was missing.
The picture was mixed.
Related: Goldman Sachs has decisive message on Google stock ahead of earnings
Traffic looked moderate, with more action in grocery and beauty than in other parts of the store, according to the Goldman Sachs channel check. Promotions had picked up a bit in women’s apparel and baby compared with a visit on April 10, and shelves were mostly well stocked. The exception was the Ulta Beauty at Target shop‑in‑shop, where they found empty spaces and signs telling customers to “find more faves online.”
On April 25, Target rolled out its Parke x Target collection, a 60‑piece line of tops, bottoms, swimwear and accessories, with most items priced under $40. By Sunday morning, April 26, most styles were sold out across categories, and social media posts were calling out how fast everything disappeared, Goldman noted. That was already the second collaboration of 2026, coming after a Roller Rabbit drop in early March.
More Retail Stocks:
- You won’t believe what Coca-Cola just did with its coffee brand
- Costco reveals a new approach that could reshape the chain
- Shoppers furious at grocery chain’s new anti‑theft rule
The traffic story that does not quite line up
Here is where I sat with the traffic numbers and Goldman’s store visit, and what jumped out at me was the split between people coming in and how they actually feel.
Using Placer.ai visit data, Goldman tracked Target’s traffic on a year‑over‑year basis into the first quarter. After a long stretch of negative comparisons in 2025, foot traffic finally turned positive in February at plus 6.9%, stayed positive in March at plus 6.4%, and then eased to plus 4.8% for April through April 21, according to Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.
Those gains are real. The problem is what sits underneath them.
Goldman also pulled in consumer sentiment data from HundredX, which tracks how shoppers feel and what they plan to buy across more than 3,000 brands. Target’s Net Promoter Score and Net Purchase Intent hit their 2025 lows in early May, then improved for a while before slipping again heading into 2026. In the week starting April 12, 2026, Net Purchase Intent was at minus 9.4% and Net Promoter Score was 24.5, an improvement from the worst levels in mid‑2025 but weaker than December’s minus 7.0% NPI and 27.3 NPS, according to HundredX data compiled by Goldman.
In simple terms, more people are walking into Target, but fewer are raving about it to anyone else.
Goldman’s $112 target and the math behind it
Goldman’s price target comes from a risk‑reward price‑to‑earnings framework that leans on bear, base and bull case relative multiples of 55%, 60% and 65%.
Here is how their numbers stack up:
- FY2026 revenue: $106.7 billion, up 1.8% from the prior year
- FY2026 earnings per share: $7.92
- FY2026 same‑store sales growth: plus 0.8%
- FY2027 EPS: $8.48, implying 7.1% growth year over year
- FY2026 dividend yield: 3.6%
- Market cap around the time of the note: $58.1 billion
Goldman expects gross margin to tick up from 27.9% in fiscal 2026 to 28.5% in 2027 and to stay there, which is not exactly a disaster scenario. The catch, as they see it, comes a year later. By fiscal 2027, Target will be cycling past the fiscal 2026 boost from tax refunds and fresh product launches while still paying up for labor, merchandising and technology. That combination could crack the longer-term earnings story, according to the Goldman note.
The new CEO is moving quickly, but the stock may be faster
Michael Fiddelke took over as CEO on February 1, 2026, after Brian Cornell moved into the executive chairman role, and he has not eased into the job.
In March, Fiddelke laid out a $5 billion capital plan for 2026, about $1 billion more than the company spent the year before, aimed at opening 30 new stores, remodeling more than 130 locations and beefing up food and beverage, according to Reuters. He also cut prices on more than 3,000 items by between 5% and 20% in categories like apparel, home goods and everyday essentials, according to USA Today.
“Target experienced a solid, positive sales increase in February, marking a significant milestone on our journey back to growth this year, and reinforcing my confidence in the momentum,” Fiddelke said, according to Reuters.
That is not empty talk. But when I look across Wall Street, the stock already reflects a lot of that optimism. The median price target sits around $125 across 51 analysts, with a Hold rating overall, TickerNerd noted. Goldman’s $112 number lives on the cautious end of that range.
Morgan Stanley is on the other side of the argument, with an Overweight rating and a $145 target as of mid‑April 2026, calling Target an “evolving turnaround story” instead of a long‑shot maybe, according to TheStreet.
So you have two big firms looking at the same company and drawing very different lines.
The consumer backdrop is not helping
Target is trying to fix itself at a time when shoppers are under strain.
University of Michigan consumer sentiment slid to 47.6 in April, down 10.7% from March and at a record low, according to CNBC. One‑year inflation expectations climbed to 4.8%, with energy prices and the Iran conflict playing a role. Goldman’s downside scenario hangs exactly on that kind of setup: weaker spending, higher product and freight costs, and pricing pressure from competitors.
Target’s core customer is middle‑income, which is the group getting squeezed hardest by those trends. Walmart is still eating into the middle of the market, and off‑price chains continue to siphon off discretionary spending in categories where Target once dominated. Goldman specifically calls out “other mass retailers and off‑price” as a structural headwind on Target’s turnaround, according to the April 27 note.
If you own Target, here is how I would read it
If you hold TGT after the last six months, you are in a stock that has done its job for you. Goldman’s target is a reminder that even good stories can get ahead of themselves.
The positives are obvious. Traffic is improving. Collaborations are sparking some real excitement. The new CEO has a concrete plan and is cutting prices where it matters. None of that is in dispute.
The open question is whether you are being paid enough for the risk from here. Goldman is effectively asking whether $129 already assumes strong execution through fiscal 2027, with no slip in margins once the easy year‑over‑year comparisons disappear. Their estimate for Q1 2026 earnings per share is just $1.32, the weakest quarter of the year.
If Fiddelke tops that number and raises guidance, the Morgan Stanley $145 story looks a lot better. If he misses and pulls back on spending, Goldman’s $112 could quickly become the new anchor for the stock.
For now, I read Goldman’s call as this: the turnaround is real, but the price is telling you not to get greedy.
Related: Target’s latest offering is so much more than a sale
